Sunday, January 17, 2010

Eureka Montana Real Estate - Ten Lakes Realty - Crystal L. Cox - Broker Owner

Eureka Montana Real Estate Broker
eureka montana property for sale
Eureka Montana Real Estate
Marketing and Search
Eureka Montana Ten Lakes Realty
is Number One in Northwest Montana Internet Marketing.
We Provide Eureka Montana Real Estate Marketing.

Eureka Montana Real Estate
Crystal L. Cox
Eureka Montana Real Estate
Ten Lakes Realty
Broker Owner
Eureka Montana Real Estate
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
eureka mt real estate
406-882-4177
Eureka Montana Real Estate

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Calling all Skeletons in Denny Rehberg's Closet - Congressman Denny Rehberg it is Election Year Coming Up and Well Time to Find Out the Truth ..

This Picture to the Left, I have a Video of This Moment, it is From the Bitterroot Star.. From a Town Hall Meet and Greet in Hamilton Montana the Summer of 2009. This is the Look that Denny Rehberg was giving one of his Native American Audience Members as she asked about Health Care and Native American Issues in Montana...

Those of You Search for Denny Rehberg On my Sites, search for Congressman Denny Rehberg Biography or Information on Denny Rehberg and his Boat Crash on Flathead Lake in Montana...

Well I just Want to Say on my Montana News by the People News Network, First of all if you got a Denny Rehberg Tip - you Can Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com ...
Next We are Getting information that those involved in Investigating the Denny Rehberg Crash on Flathead Lake have been told to STOP or Else.

We wonder what investigators might find that Congressman Denny Rehberg might be Hiding... We suspect that there was a whole lot more to that Drunken night then Congressman Denny Rehberg is willing to admit, and Denny Rehberg's Cronies surely won't tell you what he was really up to and with whom.

We wonder who was really driving that boat, who had how many drinks REALLY and what really happened that night.. as well as heading into an Election Year and All the Montana Moxy news Network ran by Mad Dog Blogger Crystal Cox, yeah that's me..
I wonder how many Skeletons will Fall right out of Congressman Denny Rehberg's Closet in 2010... how many Denny Rehberg Whistleblowers will turn up...

Well Anyway... Calling All Skeletons... Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com or better yet write on our News Network or send us a Video Clip of Your News to You...

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Ok More to Come on this But Come on Folks.. TALK - Let's Hear It

Email me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com - we want to know more about Denny Rehberg's Boating Accident, the Day that Led up to it, the Partying, who was really Driving and Why those "Looking into it" or investigating it are being Silenced and Threatened...

Maybe I got it Wrong but that is What I am Hearing So.. Let's Hear it..

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

The Second Fraud - Story Exposing the Aftermath of the Largest Fraud in MN History - Rejected by all Major MN Media Outlets

THE SECOND FRAUD is a motion picture documentary that exposes the aftermath of the arrest of Twin Cities businessman Tom Petters. Petters was the brilliant mastermind behind the first multi-billion dollar "Ponzi scheme" ever discovered.

Our exposé dives into the initial Petters controversy, exploring how he was able to keep his lucrative scheme going for what authorities say was over a decade, ending with his inevitable conviction on December 2, 2009.

When Petters' scheme was unveiled, the local community was left stunned. Not even the cynical press had seen this coming. Eventually, light was cast on a problem much greater than a simple Ponzi scheme. A second story was developing in the aftermath of the first scandal that was much more sinister.

Ultimately we discovered a tangled web of local professionals: judges, politicians and lawyers, some of which may have knowingly or unknowingly allowed the Petters fraud to perpetuate in the first place. Now these groups are left in charge to clean up the mess. As hundreds of years of legal precedent are blatantly ignored, creditors and victims are crying foul from the sidelines as they are swindled a second time by the very system that is in place to protect them.

How can this be happening? What was the motivation behind these actions? Suddenly it became clear. Tom Petters had been running a Ponzi scheme, but he also had a legitimate business empire holding such entities as the American icon, Polaroid. While there was no money left from the Ponzi scheme, there was plenty in the rest of the Petters Empire. The only problem was, to fund their fee fest, the lawyers involved needed to find a valid connection — or create one.

This film spins the tale of a dark story complete with a colorful cast of characters who are incorporating what we believe to be THE SECOND FRAUD.

THE CONTROVERSY
Ours is truly an independent film. We have worked on a shoe-string budget with a limited crew, yet we have pulled off what we believe to be incredible production value. Our relevance is ripe as we come on the coat tails of Michael Moore’s CAPITALISM : A LOVE STORY, Steven Soderbergh’s THE INFORMANT, and F. Gary Gray’s LAW ABIDING CITIZEN. The public ear is tuned into the truth about both corporate and government greed and corruption.

This film brings to the table hard questions that demand real answers. The local Twin Cities media may have followed the Petters scandal as it happened, but as an outsider, as an independent filmmaker, I bring to the table a different flavor, one that is credible but also digs below the surface.

We bought airtime on every major Network Affiliate to broadcast our film on Sunday, December 13, 2009 and Monday, December 14, 2009. When they saw the content we were dealing with, however, each network independently rejected us.

As a filmmaker, I am not disappointed by what some might call “censorship” in this situation. Others may even say this is disregard of first amendment rights. What fascinates me is what looks like a massive cover up of a continuing fraud—taking place behind the scenes of a fraud that in the public view has been stopped in its tracks. So why isn’t anybody getting their money back?

II say, give my documentary a chance. Let the questions be asked. Let the answers be heard. Do not let precedent be created by a system that may be too corrupt to change once it has gone too far.

Sincerely,

Ryan James Frost
Producer/Writer/Director
r
Link to Story
www.TheSecondFraud.com
r
r
r

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Update on the Montana Grand Jury


"November 10, 2009

The Office of Montana’s Secretary of State Has Accepted a Draft Ballot Initiative Seeking to Provide the Citizens of Montana the Ability to Summon Grand Juries By Petition

Stevensville, Montana, November 10, 2009 – The office of Montana’s Secretary of State (SOS) in Helena has accepted a ballot initiative, to be reviewed by the office of Legislative Services. This is the beginning stage of placing the initiative on the 2010 general election ballot.

This initiative has been labeled ‘Ballot Issue #18’ by the SOS, and is a Constitutional Initiative (CI), seeking to amend Montana’s Constitution, providing for the ability of the citizens to summon Grand Juries by petition.

Currently, the Montana Constitution only provides that a District Judge, at their discretion, may summon a Grand Jury. Article II, Section 20, Paragraph 2 states: “A grand jury shall consist of eleven persons, of whom eight must concur to find an indictment. A grand jury shall be drawn and summoned only at the discretion and order of the district judge.”

Serving as a ‘check and balance’ for the Constitutional Republic known as the United States, the Founders had preserved for the citizens, the right and ability to assure that the public servants kept their activities in line with the intent of the Constitution, and its Bill of Rights, which were ratified on December 15, 1791.

The term Grand Jury is mentioned only in the 5th amendment to the United States Constitution. It is meant to be a right retained by the people. It is a citizen function, not a government function, as the public has been lead to believe.

What do the courts have to say?

“An independent grand jury is to stand between the prosecutor and the accused, and to determine whether a charge is legitimate, or is dictated by malice or personal ill will.”

”Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)

The Supreme Court states that the independent grand jury’s purpose is not only to investigate possible criminal conduct, but to act as a “protector of citizens against arbitrary and oppressive governmental action,” and to perform its functions; the independent grand jury “deliberates in secret and may determine alone the course of its inquiry.”

United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974)

Article IV, Section 4 of The United States Constitution says: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government …” And, Montana is this form of government. As such, the Montana Constitution states in Section 1: “Popular sovereignty. All political power is vested in and derived from the people. All government of right originates with the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.”

And, in Section 2: “Self-government. The people have the exclusive right of governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent state. They may alter or abolish the constitution and form of government whenever they deem it necessary.”

The Founders’ intended for the sovereign citizens to ‘lend’ the public servants their specific duties. Among these is the preservation of constitutionally protected rights. The servants are not in a position, and do not have the ability to take away these sovereign, constitutionally secured rights and powers of the people.

Amending Montana’s Constitution as indicated will serve to restore the Founders’ intent, at the state level, regarding the position of, and political responsibilities required by, the citizenry.

Duane Sipe"
r
Source of Post
http://montanaconservative.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/update-on-the-montana-grand-jury/
r
and www.MontanaGrandJury.com
montana news by the people for
the people

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

JP Morgan involved in Stealing Millions of Bankruptcy Assets - Rubber-Stamped by Judge Beatty..and Between Alan Nisselson and Marc Goldberg

Again the US Trustee was Advised in Wrong Doing, Corruption
and Illegal Behavior and they Did nothing...

The US Department of Justice Bankruptcy Trustee system has serious flaws... room for Error and lots of Room for Corruption with No Accountability. Where is the Attorney General, where is the Law, is there No Checks and Balances what so ever - has there EVER been?
r
This Story Sent in Today to our Whistleblower Network
Exposing the Corruption in the US Bankruptcy Courts.

r
a Woman - a Family Suffering, fighting injustice in the US Department of Justice Bankruptcy Courts and US Trustee System for 20 Years. Have We as Tax Paying Citizens of the US .. no Rights What So Ever?
r
Here is Today's Story..
though 20 years in the making
we just got it Today...

r
"Bankruptcy Fraud Involving JP MORGAN’S Theft of Millions of Bankruptcy Assets and Collusive Settlement Between Alan Nisselson (the Bankruptcy Trustee of Bernard Madoff) AND MARC GOLDBERG

TO FRAUDULENTLY STEAL ASSETS
IS RUBBER-STAMPED BY JUDGE BEATTY
OF THE US BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
NEW YORK, NY

On Thursday October 28, 2009, The Law Offices of David H. Relkin, on behalf of Donna A. Sturman, applied to retiring Bankruptcy Judge Prudence Beatty, to have the Court “finally do justice” and order JP Morgan and the Trustee to turn over Millions of Dollars of stolen assets—which the Judge flatly denied by claiming Donna “had no standing.”

This case is virtually a tale ripped from the pages of the Trustee’s Manual of Bankruptcy Fraud and Abuse.

On Thursday, the Court having never required an accounting of his collections and distributions in the case, the Trustee finally disclosed that he had taken in over $41 Million Dollars, still leaving the mystery of where the money went, although most of it found its way into the coffers of JP Morgan.

Prior to the Bankruptcy, the Bank chased after Donna’s brothers to lend them Millions for a hostile takeover of The Cooper Companies, Inc. and, due to its theft of assets, JP Morgan is now one of Cooper’s largest shareholders.

Once the Bank became aware that, what the brothers called their silent partner, Donna Sturman, had commenced an action against them for waste, dissipation and fraudulent transfers of the Sturman Family properties, which were being used by the brothers as their private piggy bank, the Bank frantically began illegally acquiring security interests in the Family assets to secure the brothers’ personal loans with property owned by their sister, including the Southeast Corner of 86th Street, leaving the properties empty shells.

In furtherance of its unlawful conspiracy, the Bank then filed Bankruptcy Petitions against Donna’s three brothers, and installed its handpicked Trustee and law firms, who were counsel the Bank as well as all the other major creditors in the Bankruptcy—which conflict of interest, under the Bankruptcy Code, requires disgorgement of the attorneys’ enormous fees.
Thus, the Bank was able to play both sides of the table by making all the major decisions in the Bankruptcy, while its own officers negligently left a trail of brazen correspondence of the Bank’s collusive and corrupt instructions to the Trustee.

Judge Beatty repeatedly approved the Bank’s unlawful acquisition and sale of non-debtor assets, allowing her Court to satisfy fraudulent claims over a 20 year period.

Under her supervision, the Bank, the Trustee and his law firms were able to rape the assets of the Sturman Family—none of which were in bankruptcy—and to line their pockets with millions of dollars of stolen money.

Judge Beatty blatantly and improperly dismissed Ms. Sturman’s action against the Bank for “lack of prosecution,” after the action was fully briefed, while keeping in place an injunction prohibiting Donna from taking any discovery of the Banks.

The complicity in fraudulent conduct did not stop there during this 20 year old case (perhaps the longest running bankruptcy in New York).

Although the US Trustee was repeatedly advised and supplied with evidence of these crimes, it inexplicably sat on its hands, despite its legal obligation to supervise and investigate Trustee misconduct.

To force the brothers to help the Bank go along with its embezzlement, it threatened the brothers with criminal prosecution, and after the Bank got it, had the brothers indicted anyway for submitting false financials, spending thirteen months in federal prison. Unsurprisingly, the Bank officers testified with immunity.

Despite Orders obtained by Donna preventing sales of the properties, the Trustee was allowed by Judge Beatty to simply ignore them, allowing one of the most valuable assets of the Sturman Family Enterprises to be “abandoned” so the Bank could acquire the property for free without using up any of its debt—a lender fraud called “double dipping.”

The Bank and its hand-picked Trustee then took control over the other non-bankrupt properties, used them as cash cows, and after bleeding them dry, sold them for the asking to third parties (including one by the Trustee to his own employee) while the Trustee took in $1.0 Million Dollars a year for seven years on just one property.

Where the money went is still a mystery.

The United States Trustee Program is a component of the Department of Justice that, according to its website, “seeks to act as the watchdog over the bankruptcy process to protect the integrity of the Federal bankruptcy system.”

In addition the Department of Justice has the responsibility to ensure compliance with applicable laws and procedures and to identify and investigate bankruptcy fraud and abuse in coordination with United States Attorneys and the FBI.

The Attorney General is charged with the appointment of United States Trustees and Assistant United States Trustees.

On Thursday, after Judge Beatty awarded the Trustee a cumulative amount of over $8 Million Dollars in fees to him and his law firms (which Judge Beatty fittingly called “Blood Money”), Judge Beatty characterized the negligent failure of the Trustee to do anything in the Bankruptcy case for the last ten years by saying, “I understand how busy people can get.”

It is counsel’s opinion that such award of fees was a transfer of stolen money.

In attempting to fight Judge Beatty’s indifference to the criminal activities committed in her Court, Donna retained Helen Chaitman, who coined the phrase “lender liability” but who, like so many of Donna’s attorneys walked away when Donna’s money ran out.

So “successful” in their control of the Bankruptcy, the Bank and the Trustee blocked all of Donna’s income, forcing the heiress to be locked in handcuffs by Judge Beatty, evicted over seven times with her three young children, once in the middle of a winter blizzard, and then thrown into a fraudulent bankruptcy by one of her own law firms whose debt to the Bank was wiped off the books.

Once forced into Bankruptcy, Alan Nisselson, who now supervises the Madoff Bankruptcy, was appointed as Donna’s Trustee to clean up Ms. Sturman’s dangerous claims once and for all.

Without any notice to Ms. Sturman, he settled all of Donna’s claims in the brothers’ bankruptcy in a collusive and illegal agreement in which the Trustees even released each other—a violation of law and the Code of Professional Responsibility—which settlement was immediately rubber-stamped by Judge Beatty.

Mr. Relkin is now analyzing the case in order to determine what appropriate actions to take to vindicate Ms. Sturman’s rights.

For further information contact:
David H. Relkin, Esq.
Law Offices of David H. Relkin
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018

David@RelkinLaw.com

212.244.8722

Links: www.DavidRelkinLaw.com
r
Click Here For Press Release PDF Document
r
More on the Corruption of US Bankruptcy Attorneys, US Bankruptcy Department of Justice Trustees and the Whole Liquidation Process....
r
www.ObsidianFinanceSuck.com
r
www.LiquidatingTrustee.com
r
www.Summit1031BdJustice.com
r

Friday, December 11, 2009

Melinda Gopher is seeking the State of Montana's sole Congressional seat in the U.S. House of Representatives.

"Melinda Gopher, 44, an Ojibwe / Blackfeet from Missoula, Montana is seeking the State of Montana's sole Congressional seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. While many glass ceilings have been shattered; a Native American woman has yet to be elected to the U.S. Congress.

Gopher's running as a progressive Democrat and focusing her campaign on jobs. The current recession has hit Montana's communities hard, even though the state unemployment rate is not as critical as the overall national rate of 10%; it is deceiving. Montana does not count long term unemployed workers who have given up.

Melinda is a civil rights activist, and blogger. She is a Paralegal but decided to run for the U.S. House believing she can make a difference in the nation's capitol. Melinda Gopher believes the nation does not have to choose between cap and trade and carbon taxation as revenue raising; rather, clean energy must be pursued to create jobs no matter what.

Melinda supports the Employee Free Choice Act as a means for keeping American labor strong. She believes corporations have gone unchecked, and have had a negative impact in DC. This has led to the loss of jobs and outsourcing of jobs to artificially inflate corporate profit margins. Gopher believes exploiting labor forces in foreign countries is detrimental to the world economy in the long term. Loss of workers' rights has created unfair trade policies between the U.S., China, India to point to a few examples. Corporate exploitation and economic coercion do not create win/win partnerships: something Gopher wants to create.

Gopher supports overhauling the nation's ailing housing sector. She believes the low-income are mired in HUD programs of the past. Not enough of the nation's low and middle income people are building personal wealth equity--resulting in lost economic power and a declining tax base. She believes there must be revolutionary changes in the national housing policy that will reverse the housing crisis. She would enact laws ending financial apartheid in America, and ban policies mired in the FHA redlining legacy. She vows to "pick up where Bobby Kennedy left off" in ending American poverty.

Melinda is the spouse of a combat disabled veteran and cares about veteran issues. She believes the VA ratings system is broken, she currently supports the efforts of national veterans groups to work with Montana Senator Jon Tester to fix the system so that it works for veterans.

Melinda Gopher is a long time civil rights, tribal sovereignty, and environmental activist. She believes HUD has been a weak institutional home for civil rights and supports the creation of a cabinet level agency for civil rights. She believes state-by-state laws on gay marriage are the wrong approach and unjust. She believes the federal government must beef up the 1964 Civil Rights Act and Amendments to include sweeping protections for gays, lesbians, transsexuals and bisexuals.

Melinda Gopher points out, "the black codes are a disgraceful part of America's past. The state-by-state approach are the black codes for the LGBT community, why are we tolerating this inequality?" She believes to ensure an end to discrimination against gays and to provide for their full civil rights--will require federal intervention as was done in the 1960s civil rights movement.

Melinda Gopher has been a civil rights practitioner since her early 20s. She was the only Native American panelist in the 1994 National Fair Housing Summit and worked to enact fair housing protections in Montana. Melinda Gopher has worked in the public and private sector on fair housing.

She believes the nation needs another Fair Housing Summit to address the subprime crisis. She points out, "not enough is being done to ensure Americans keep their homes, and participate in the American dream of homeownership."

Melinda Gopher knows her candidacy is improbable; she believes her voice is needed to address the lack of effective Native American leadership in the state Democratic party. She believes the Native Americans advancing in the political party pipeline in the state are tokens and are placed in positions where they are politically neutered.

She is a vocal critic of Senator Max Baucus's mishandling of state tribal issues, his failure to address long term and chronic unemployment in the state's seven Indian reservations and urban areas. She has criticized the Senator over taking single payer off the table in health care reform. Melinda Gopher is likely to challenge Baucus in 2014 when he comes up for re-election."
melinda Gopher
www.MelindaForMontana.com
r
www.MelindaGopher.com
r